The post The discovery of ‘zero’ and why it matters appeared first on Sapardanis Kostas.

]]>While mathematicians started thinking about the concept of zero around 3,000 BC (and rejected it), it was not before 200-300 BC that the **Babylonians** used a symbol that evolved into what we now know as ‘zero’. The Babylonians changed the form of the symbol many times, from two parallel lines to these:

In the time when mathematics was merely a method to count physical objects and solve problems of daily experience, there was no need for such a number. In order for someone to say he has “0 camels” he would just say “I don’t have camels”. There is already a large leap of reason from “5 camels” to “5 objects” and to the more abstract “5”. Moreover, the use of zero allowed us to think of mathematics as something abstract, and not only as a method to measure things.

Later, somewhere between 400 and 1200 AD, the concept of zero evolved, and it was accepted that it meant a *number*. If this belated reception of zero as a number still seems peculiar to you, consider that for a long time even ‘1’ wasn’t deemed to be a number. It was thought that a number of things had to mean *many* things at once. So, when there was 1 camel, there was just “a camel”. Only with the appearance of a second camel did the need to count them arrive.

The basic idea in the case of zero was the creation of a number for “nothing”. The important idea was the notion of a new kind of number, which would represent the specific idea of “nothing”.

Initially, zero was used as a punctuation mark, as an indicator, as a means to solve the problem of writing a number with many digits. Without zero, the number 2046 would be written as 246, as would the number 2460. Only using context could someone understand the difference. This is not as strange as it sounds. When, today, someone replies “Two and a half” to the question “How much for an ice-cream?” we understand “2.5 euros”, while the same answer to the question “What time is it?” means something completely different. Context makes all the difference. Here, the zero is not exactly used as a number yet, but as a mark showing us the meaning of whatever is written on paper. More accurately, the number 2046 means we have 2 thousands, 0 hundreds, 4 tens and 6 units.

The discovery of zero allowed us to also construct the **negative numbers**, which were also not needed for a period. There was no need to know about negative numbers when we were counting camels. Negative camels would mean debt in camels. Fibonacci, around 1,200 AD, allowed negative results in problems that preoccupied him concerning financial issues, and he interpreted them as *debt* or *loss*, instead of the *profit* that a positive number signifies.

The **ancient Greeks**, even though they made great progress in mathematics, used geometry as a basis for their theories. There was no need to think abstractly about numbers, as they counted lengths of lines and circumferences. So they did not think about ‘zero’ even as an indicator (as the Babylonians did before them). There were exceptions, like some astronomers and, later, Ptolemy in the 2^{nd} century AD (in *Almagest*), who used the symbol “O”, but only as a punctuation mark.

The **Indians** adopted it, and in 7^{th} century AD they made the first use of negative and decimal numbers, leading it to a more sophisticated form that is similar to the modern one. So, they used it both as a *number*, meaning a symbol that *represents something* (this “something”, here, is the “*nothing*”), and as an *index*. Some say it is the notion of *nothingness* (or insignificance) referred to in philosophical texts of the East that this umber was ascribed to. The word “shunya”, which meant “void”, “nothing”, something like “salvation”, is the word they used for the number ‘zero’. But it was the **Arabs** who evolved its usage developing algebra, and spread it during the ‘golden age of the Arabs’ (roughly between 8^{th} and 12^{th} century). The English word “zero” comes from the Arabic word “sifr”.

The adoption of zero in relation to the Arabic numbers that replaced the Latin ones, allowed for the quick and easy modern method of multiplication and division. Imagine the multiplication table in Latin numbers… But their spread was hindered by **religious prejudice**, as the Arabic numbers were considered too easy to manipulate in order to commit forgery or deception (the number 1 is easily transformed into the number 7) and the negative numbers (that would not be discovered without the zero) were deemed blasphemous by associating them to profit made from gambling and usury that creates debt. Besides, nothingness was identified with chaos and the void, elements of hell in the Christian tradition. The use of negative numbers was spread just in the 16^{th} century AD.

**Sources****:**

- Ian Stewart – Οι Αριθμοί της Φύσης
- Robert Kaplan – The Nothing That Is, a Natural History of Zero
- Alex Bellos – Alex’s Adventures in Numberland
- Alex Bellos – Nirvana by numbers (Guardian, 2013)
- http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/Zero.html
- http://www.quora.com/Mathematics/Why-is-the-concept-of-zero-so-important-in-mathematics
- http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/you-can-visit-the-worlds-oldest-zero-at-a-temple-in-india-2120286/
- http://science.howstuffworks.com/math-concepts/zero1.htm
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_%28number%29#History
- http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-origin-of-zer/
- http://www.und.edu/instruct/lgeller/zeroph.html

* *

The post The discovery of ‘zero’ and why it matters appeared first on Sapardanis Kostas.

]]>